Skip to main content

Indexing the Social Security Earnings Test to a Wage Series Two Years Old

Two exempt amounts, and neither one moves with the COLA Benefit checks rose 2.8 percent in January 2026. The earnings test limits standing in front of those checks rose 4.62 percent and 4.83 percent. Two indexing rules sit behind those numbers, and a household that assumes the earnings test limit tracks the COLA will project the wrong figure. The test withholds benefits from people who claim Social Security before full retirement age and keep working. Two exempt amounts apply. For years entirely before the year of full retirement age, the 2026 annual amount is $24,480, and the Social Security Administration states in Exempt Amounts Under the Earnings Test that it will "withhold $1 in benefits for every $2 of earnings in excess of the lower exempt amount." In the calendar year a person reaches full retirement age, the amount is $65,160 and the rate falls to $1 for every $3. Neither figure is a cost-of-living adjustment. Section 203(f)(8)(B) of the Social Security Act ti...

The Roth Five-Year Rule Is Two Rules: One Lifetime Clock and One Per Conversion

A Roth IRA carries two five-year periods, and the Treasury regulation that defines them keeps them in different questions. One appears in A-1 and A-2 of 26 CFR 1.408A-6, Distributions; the other appears in A-5 of the same section. They start on different days, they are counted for different purposes, and the regulation says the two "need not be the same." Most summaries of the "Roth five-year rule" describe one period and leave the reader to assume the other is the same one.

The two-part test in A-1

A-1(b) of the regulation states that "A distribution from a Roth IRA is not includible in the owner's gross income if it is a qualified distribution or to the extent that it is a return of the owner's contributions to the Roth IRA (determined in accordance with A-8 of this section)." It then defines the term. A qualified distribution "is one that is both—(1) Made after a 5-taxable-year period (defined in A-2 of this section); and (2) Made on or after the date on which the owner attains age 59½, made to a beneficiary or the estate of the owner on or after the date of the owner's death, attributable to the owner's being disabled within the meaning of section 72(m)(7), or to which section 72(t)(2)(F) applies (exception for first-time home purchase)."

Two conditions, joined by "both." Age alone does not qualify a distribution, and elapsed time alone does not qualify one either. The five-year period referenced here is the one defined in A-2 — not any other five-year period that may also be running.

Clock one: A-2 starts it once and never restarts it

A-2 fixes the start date this way: "The 5-taxable-year period described in A-1 of this section begins on the first day of the individual's taxable year for which the first regular contribution is made to any Roth IRA of the individual or, if earlier, the first day of the individual's taxable year in which the first conversion contribution is made to any Roth IRA of the individual."

Three features of that sentence do most of the work. The period begins on the first day of a taxable year, not on the day money moved. It looks to the year for which a regular contribution is made, which is not always the year in which it is deposited. And a conversion contribution can start it too, if it comes earlier.

A-2 then closes the door on restarting: "Thus, each Roth IRA owner has only one 5-taxable-year period described in A-1 of this section for all the Roth IRAs of which he or she is the owner." Not one per account, not one per contribution. Opening a second Roth IRA at a different custodian in 2026 does not create a second period, and the regulation provides no restart mechanism. The one adjustment appears in A-2's own closing sentence: "For purposes of this A-2, the amount of any contribution distributed as a corrective distribution under A-1(d) of this section is treated as if it was never contributed."

A-7 extends that past death: "The beginning of the 5-taxable-year period described in A-1 of this section is not redetermined when the Roth IRA owner dies." For a surviving spouse who treats the account as his or her own, A-7(b) says the period "ends at the earlier of the end of either the 5-taxable-year period for the decedent or the 5-taxable-year period applicable to the spouse's own Roth IRAs." Earlier, not later.

A first regular contribution made on April 15, 2027 for tax year 2026 puts the start date at January 1, 2026 and the end at December 31, 2030 — 1,356 days after the money actually arrived, or three years and eight months of real possession satisfying a period the regulation calls five taxable years.

Two kinds of five-taxable-year period, on one calendar Owner whose first regular Roth contribution is for tax year 2026, then converts in 2026, 2027 and 2028 A-2 — qualified-distribution period, one per owner for life Jan 1, 2026 → Dec 31, 2030 A-5 — separate 10-percent period, determined for each conversion 2026 conversion → Dec 31, 2030 2027 conversion → Dec 31, 2031 2028 conversion → Dec 31, 2032 202620272028 202920302031 2032 Periods drawn from 26 CFR 1.408A-6 A-2 and A-5. Each ends on the last day of the fifth consecutive taxable year.

Clock two: A-5 starts a new period with every conversion

A-5 answers a different question — whether the 10-percent additional tax under section 72(t) applies. Subsection (a) covers the ordinary case: the tax "will apply (unless the distribution is excepted under section 72(t)) to any distribution from a Roth IRA includible in gross income."

Subsection (b) is the one that surprises people. "The 10-percent additional tax under section 72(t) also applies to a nonqualified distribution, even if it is not then includible in gross income, to the extent it is allocable to a conversion contribution, if the distribution is made within the 5-taxable-year period beginning with the first day of the individual's taxable year in which the conversion contribution was made." A converted amount was already taxed in the year of conversion, so pulling it back out is not a second income event. A-5(b) attaches the 10 percent to it anyway, and only to the taxed part: "For purposes of applying the tax, only the amount of the conversion contribution includible in gross income as a result of the conversion is taken into account."

Subsection (c) states the separation directly. "The 5-taxable-year period described in this A-5 for purposes of determining whether section 72(t) applies to a distribution allocable to a conversion contribution is separately determined for each conversion contribution, and need not be the same as the 5-taxable-year period used for purposes of determining whether a distribution is a qualified distribution under A-1(b) of this section."

The regulation supplies its own illustration, still written in the dates of its original issuance. A calendar-year taxpayer takes a traditional IRA distribution on December 31, 1998, converts it on February 25, 1999, and makes a regular contribution for 1998 on that same day. The result: "the 5-taxable-year period for purposes of this A-5 begins on January 1, 1999, while the 5-taxable-year period for purposes of A-1(b) of this section begins on January 1, 1998."

What December 31 and January 2 do to the same dollar

Because A-5(b) runs from the first day of the taxable year in which the conversion was made, the calendar date of a conversion changes the end date in steps of a full year. A conversion completed on December 31, 2026 sits in tax year 2026; its period ends December 31, 2030, which is 1,461 days after the transaction. A conversion completed on January 2, 2027 sits in tax year 2027; its period ends December 31, 2031, which is 1,824 days after the transaction. Two days apart on the calendar, 365 days apart at the finish line.

Inside a single tax year the effect runs the other way: a conversion on January 1, 2026 waits 1,825 days to clear its own period, a conversion on December 31, 2026 waits 1,461, and both clear on the same date. That 364-day spread is the cost of the taxable-year convention — the same convention that lets a single day of December eligibility fill a whole year's HSA limit and start a 13-month testing period.

An owner who converts in several years runs several of these at once. Take a first regular contribution for tax year 2022 and conversions in 2023, 2024 and 2026: the A-2 period ends December 31, 2026, and the three A-5 periods end December 31, 2027, December 31, 2028 and December 31, 2030. Four end dates, one account, and the earliest is not the one that controls the 10-percent question on the newest conversion.

The ordering rules decide which clock is being tested

Which period applies depends on which layer of the account a withdrawal is treated as coming from, and the owner does not choose. A-8(a) states that "Any amount distributed from an individual's Roth IRA is treated as made in the following order (determined as of the end of a taxable year and exhausting each category before moving to the following category)—(1) From regular contributions; (2) From conversion contributions, on a first-in-first-out basis; and (3) From earnings." A-8(b) adds a rule inside the middle layer: "To the extent a distribution is treated as made from a particular conversion contribution, it is treated as made first from the portion, if any, that was includible in gross income as a result of the conversion."

The same three layers appear as line items on IRS Form 8606, Nondeductible IRAs. In Part III of the 2025 revision, line 22 is "Enter your basis in Roth IRA contributions" and line 24 is "Enter your basis in conversions from traditional IRAs and rollovers from qualified retirement plans to a Roth IRA." Regular contributions are subtracted first, conversions second, and whatever survives both subtractions is the taxable remainder.

A-8 ordering, and where each layer lands on Form 8606 Part III Order is fixed by the regulation; each category is exhausted before the next is reached 1. Regular contributions Neither period applies. No income tax, no 10 percent. Line 22 — "your basis in Roth IRA contributions" 2. Conversion contributions, first in first out A-5 period tested per conversion. 10 percent may apply. Line 24 — "your basis in conversions… to a Roth IRA" 3. Earnings A-2 period decides. Taxable if the distribution is not qualified. Line 25a — the remainder after lines 22 and 24 Layers from 26 CFR 1.408A-6 A-8. Line captions quoted from Form 8606 (2025), IRS Cat. No. 63966F.

Where the second clock stops mattering

A-5(b) ends with a sentence that determines who ever feels the conversion period at all: "The exceptions under section 72(t) also apply to such a distribution." The IRS table of exceptions in IRS, Retirement topics — Exceptions to tax on early distributions lists, under Age, distributions made "after participant/IRA owner reaches age 59½," citing section 72(t)(2)(A)(i).

Combined with A-5, that collapses the map. For a dollar allocable to the taxed portion of a conversion, the combinations resolve like this.

Situation at the time of distributionIncome tax on that dollar10 percent under 72(t)
Under 59½, inside that conversion's own A-5 periodNo — A-5(b) applies "even if it is not then includible in gross income"Yes, unless another 72(t) exception applies
Under 59½, past that conversion's A-5 periodNoNo
59½ or older, inside that conversion's A-5 periodNoNo — the 72(t)(2)(A)(i) age exception applies
59½ or older, past the A-2 periodNo; and earnings are also untaxed, because the A-1 test is metNo

The conversion period therefore does its work in one cell only. Past 59½ it is inert; before 59½ it can attach 10 percent to money that produces no taxable income at all. The A-2 period does the opposite: it never touches conversion principal, and governs only the earnings layer, where a failure means ordinary income tax plus, under A-5(a), the 10 percent unless excepted.

The income test that gates one of A-2's two triggers

A-2 gives two possible triggers for the lifetime period: the first regular contribution or, if earlier, the first conversion contribution. Whether the first of those is available at all depends on an income test the IRS republishes every year. In IRS Notice 2025-67, 2026 Amounts Relating to Retirement Plans and IRAs, "For singles and heads of household, the income phase-out range is between $153,000 and $168,000, increased from between $150,000 and $165,000." For married couples filing jointly the 2026 range is "between $242,000 and $252,000," and for a married individual filing separately the range "is not subject to an annual cost-of-living adjustment and remains between $0 and $10,000." The same notice sets the 2026 ceiling under section 219(b)(5)(A), which "is increased from $7,000 to $7,500."

Those ranges are read the same way as the traditional-side band, where modified AGI goes in and the 2026 IRA deduction comes out in $10 steps. A-2 names two triggers, and above the top of the range the first of them drops out, so a conversion contribution is the only trigger left standing in the text of A-2. Whether a conversion is in fact permitted at that income level is not established by anything quoted in this article.

Roth contribution phase-out band, singles and heads of household Modified AGI, $ thousands. Each bar runs from the floor to the ceiling of that tax year's range. 115125135 145155165 175 137139140 144153161 165168 122124125 129138146 150153 201920202021 202220232024 20252026 Sources: IRS Notices 2018-83, 2019-59, 2020-79, 2021-61, 2022-55, 2023-75, 2024-80 and 2025-67. The band is $15,000 wide in every one of these eight years; only its position moves.

The floor rose $31,000 across the eight years and the ceiling rose the same $31,000, which is why the band stayed exactly $15,000 wide from 2019 through 2026. The same account pair splits at four separate thresholds in the 2026 tax year, and this income test is only one of them.

Numbers to Re-check

FigureValue used hereYear this article is written onWhere it is publishedWhat replaces it
IRA contribution ceiling, section 219(b)(5)(A)$7,5002026IRS Notice 2025-67The notice that publishes the following year's amounts
Roth contribution phase-out, single and head of household$153,000 to $168,0002026IRS Notice 2025-67Same notice cycle
Roth contribution phase-out, married filing jointly$242,000 to $252,0002026IRS Notice 2025-67Same notice cycle
Roth contribution phase-out, married filing separately$0 to $10,0002026IRS Notice 2025-67Stated there as "not subject to an annual cost-of-living adjustment"
Additional tax rate on a non-excepted early distribution10 percentCurrent regulation text26 CFR 1.408A-6 A-5, citing section 72(t)Statutory change only
Form 8606 Part III line numbers 22, 24 and 25a2025 revision, Cat. No. 63966F2025 form yearIRS Form 8606Each annual revision; line numbers can move
Currency of the regulation text quoted here"up to date as of 9/08/2026"As displayed on eCFReCFR, title 26Updated continuously

Where This Doesn't Apply

This reading is limited to what 26 CFR 1.408A-6 says about Roth IRAs held by an individual owner on a calendar taxable year. Designated Roth accounts inside an employer plan are not Roth IRAs, and this section does not address them; A-2 speaks only of "any Roth IRA of the individual." A fiscal-year taxpayer does not get the January 1 start dates used throughout this article, because A-2 and A-5 both anchor on "the first day of the individual's taxable year." And A-5(b) says "The exceptions under section 72(t) also apply to such a distribution" — the IRS exceptions table runs well beyond the age entry quoted above, and whether any particular one applies is a fact question this article does not reach.

The regulation text is also older than the statute it implements. Its examples are written in 1998 and 1999 dates, and A-6 addresses a four-year income spread available only for 1998 conversions. More pointedly, 26 CFR 1.408A-4, Converting amounts to Roth IRAs, in the same subject group and displayed by eCFR as current to September 8, 2026, still reads at A-2: "An individual with modified AGI in excess of $100,000 for a taxable year is not permitted to convert an amount to a Roth IRA during that taxable year." Notice 2025-67 publishes phase-out ranges for taxpayers making contributions to a Roth IRA and publishes no corresponding figure for conversions. Whether that $100,000 sentence remains operative is not answered anywhere inside section 1.408A-6 and is not established by anything quoted here; it is a question for current-year IRS guidance and for section 408A itself. Nothing in the two periods described above depends on it.

Finally, none of this addresses whether a conversion or a distribution is a good idea. The regulation defines when a period starts and when it ends, and says nothing about whether it should be waited out.

This article explains how the rules are written. It is not tax, legal, or insurance advice, and it does not account for any individual situation. Amounts and thresholds change; verify the current figures at the source listed above before acting.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 2027 COLA Rests on Three CPI-W Readings and Two Are Unpublished

The cost-of-living adjustment that will appear in Social Security payments in January 2027 does not exist yet. It is not a projection that the Social Security Administration is preparing, and it is not a policy choice that anyone will make in the fall. It is an arithmetic result of three monthly price index readings, and as of late August 2026 only the first of the three has been published. That distinction matters for anyone building a household budget around it. A forecast published in August is a statement about two unpublished numbers. The mechanism that will convert those numbers into a percentage, however, is fully specified in advance and can be described exactly. What the adjustment actually measures The Social Security Administration states that the COLA is based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers, abbreviated CPI-W and produced by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The comparison is not year over year in the ordinary sense. SSA compares...

20.94 Percent Versus 6.52 Percent: Ranking Debt Payoff Against Investing the Same Dollar

A household with a card balance, a student loan, a car note and a few hundred dollars of monthly slack faces a ranking problem. The same dollar cannot both retire a balance and buy a share. The shorthand that circulates — clear anything above six or seven percent, invest below it — is a summary of an arithmetic result, not the arithmetic. It breaks where the tax code touches one side of the comparison and not the other, and in 2026 it touches two of the four debts most households carry. One side is a rate. The other side is a distribution. Paying a dollar against a revolving balance removes the interest that dollar would have accrued. If the balance would otherwise have sat untouched for twelve months at 22.15 percent, then $1,000 applied to it avoids $221.50 of interest. That is a 22.15 percent return, fixed in advance, with no spread around it, and no Form 1099 is issued for it because avoided interest is not income. Buying an investment produces an expected return with a wide ...

A Treasury Bill Quoted at 3.86 Percent Is Not a 3.86 Percent Yield

Treasury’s Daily Treasury Bill Rates table for September 3, 2026 lists the 26-week bill at 3.86 percent. A six-month certificate of deposit advertised at 4.00 percent APY looks higher by 14 basis points. The two figures are not measured on the same scale. One is a discount quote struck against par on a 360-day year; the other is an annual effective yield; and only one of them escapes state income tax. Converted onto a single scale, the same bill is 4.03 percent, and the state exemption moves the line a second time. What follows is the conversion, the statute behind the exemption, and the point at which a higher headline deposit rate stops winning. One Bill Carries Three Different Rates Two of the three are published side by side. The Treasury page that carries the daily series defines the first column this way: “The Bank Discount rate is the rate at which a bill is quoted in the secondary market and is based on the par value, amount of the discount and a 360-day year....